So it
turns out we humans don't like being told when we're wrong. As a
rule, we mostly don't enjoy having our deeply held beliefs and
preconceptions challenged or even questioned either. We actually
hate it—like “gnashing of teeth” hate it. Enter the prophet.
These are folks who God has assigned the never-dull task of poking
the hornet's nest of human insecurities and exposing the depths of
our deeply entrenched rebellion against God. The prophet
relentlessly advocates for the heart of God when his heart is being
overlooked or ignored. The prophet unapologetic preaches repentance
and reformation against the oncoming traffic of popular culture, even
popular Christian culture. The prophet is ultimately more concerned
with what God thinks than what people think. As a result, prophets
are often seen as abrupt, stubborn, malcontents and agitators. As
you can imagine, it usually doesn't go well for the prophet.
Prophets
are a special breed. When we think of these men and women, we
usually think of someone foretelling the future. While they are
known to do that, the prophet primarily repeats what God has already
said and has been saying for generations. The prophet reminds people
of who God is and what he prioritizes and then points
them back to what they should already know. When God gives the
prophet a peek into the future it's usually just to establish their
credibility (Isaiah 45:21) and not the primary message they are
charged with delivering. Jeremiah explains the prophet's visceral
motivation, “...his word burns in my heart like a fire. It’s like
a fire in my bones! I am worn out trying to hold it in! I can’t do
it!" (Jeremiah 20:9b NLT).
Prophets
are on the fringe. They're usually a little off, as they march to a
different drum. It's not unheard of for them to exhibit oddities
like wild hair and crazy clothing choices or unexplainable behavior
(John the Baptizer ate grasshoppers and as an object lesson Isaiah
preached buck-naked for awhile... just saying). Don't write them off
because they're out of step. It's often this wilderness-dwelling,
outsider lifestyle that makes them the ideal candidates to deeply
commune with the heart of God and quickly identify our collective
blind spots. Not to mention that you've gotta be a certain kind of
crazy to look a king in the eye and rebuke him to his face.
As
mentioned, prophets are against the status quo. When everyone else
says “yes,” the prophet says “no.” They don't say what we
want to hear. They say what we need to hear. They're definitely not
winning any popularity contests. Nor would they care to. There's a
funny story in 1 Kings chapter 22 where King Ahab of Israel is
seeking affirmation from a group of faux-prophets for his proposed
war with the nation of Aram. They all enthusiastically give him the
thumbs up and tell him “full speed ahead.” But Ahab's ally,
Jehoshaphat of Judah, wants to hear from a prophet of YHWH before
they head out. Ahab's response cracks me up and is typical of our
fallen, corrupted flesh. He says, “There is still one prophet
through whom we can inquire of the LORD, but I hate him because he
never prophesies anything good about me, but always bad.” Ahab
apparently subscribes to the time-honored “what I don't know can't
hurt me” philosophy. It reminds me of the guy who doesn't want to
go to the dentist because they always find a cavity. So at
Jehoshaphat's insistence, they bring the Debbie-Downer into the war
room. After some coaxing, Micaiah delivers the word from God, and,
just as Ahab predicted, it's bad news—like really bad news. He
tells them that the military campaign will be a complete failure and
will result in Ahab's death. Ahab has him promptly thrown in prison
and orders that he be fed nothing but bread and water. Gee, thanks
for your word from the LORD, Micaiah. Actually he got off pretty
easy compared to many of his forebearers. Jeremiah is another guy
who had an unpopular message. During the final years of Judah's
sovereignty, when all the other prophets were predicting peace,
prosperity, and liberation from their Babylonian oppressors, Jeremiah
was encouraging the people to—get this—lay down their arms and
surrender to Nebuchadnezzar, a guy who would undoubtedly knock their
wall down, disrespect their king, desecrate their holy city, and
probably castrate more than a few of the guys (just for good measure)
before he relocated most of them to some far off foreign land. God
had made it clear that his mind was made up, punishment was immanent,
and the people of Judah were being instructed to obediently receive
their well-earned whupping. For his unpatriotic suggestion Jeremiah
was labeled a cowardly traitor and thrown in a dank hole. It could
have been worse.
It
should be noted that we don't so much mind when the prophets are
speaking to someone else. In fact, it's in these instances that
we're likely to encourage them to “bring the heat.” It's when
they direct their rebuke to us that we take “offense” and become
combative, feverishly scrambling for our favorite snippets of verses
that instantly render their criticisms invalid to our particular
case. We fancy ourselves as the ones who listen to the prophets, but
I often wonder if we give ourselves too much credit. Would I have
heeded the voice of the one crazy looking guy saying to go this
direction or would I have followed the masses headed off the other
way? I find that it's easy enough to sort things out once the dust
has settled. We typically put ourselves on the side of the
historical prophets, but do we stand with the contemporary prophets
who are challenging us with the unpopular, but timeless, truths of
God's word today? Jesus, who was—among other things—a prophet,
points out this inconsistency in his detractors. “Woe to you,”
he says, “because you build tombs for the prophets, and it was your
ancestors who killed them” (Luke 11:47). These Johnny-come-lately
fanboys of the prophets were building monuments to the individuals
their own parents murdered due to the inconvenience of the message
they faithfully delivered. You see it's easy to pay lip service to a
message from another time and to another people. We can interpret it
in a way that's palatable and safe. It's an entirely different
matter, however, when the messenger is standing before us with an
uncompromising call to repentance, which inevitably will
entail—gasp!—a reconsideration of our dearly held position and a
drastic change in our current direction.
Let's be
honest, throughout history the prophets have largely stood alone.
Most abolitionists, for example, were Christian prophets,
persistently calling the Church to repentance, pointing the people of
God to the heart of God, and stubbornly demanding that they live out
what they claimed they believed. While the American Church now
widely praises these reformers, it was many of our Christian
ancestors who made their lives a living hell and actively worked
against them (in some cases murdered them). It was not uncommon to
have sermons preached on the virtues of slavery and how it's one's
Christian duty to know one's place and so on. Manifest destiny and
all that. Others were just silent in the face of evil. Similar
struggles, opposition, and indifference were faced by the relative
few who fought for justice during the early days of the civil rights
movement. Everyone is at the victory celebration when the war is
won, and the “troublemakers” of today are often the heroes of
tomorrow. Call them “bull-headed” and “arrogant” if you
must, but thank God that the prophets have the grit and internal
conviction to stay the course through the heaviest of the fray with
little to no human backup.
I
believe God has hard-wired the prophet this way for this express
purpose. I love what God tells Ezekiel when he is prepping him for
his prophetic mission. "You must give them my messages whether
they listen or not." He goes on to say, "I have made you as
obstinate and hard-hearted as they are.” And the super important
part, “...let all my words sink deep into your own heart first.
Listen to them carefully for yourself. Then go to your people in
exile and say to them, ‘This is what the Sovereign LORD says!’"
(from Ezekiel 2:7a, 8b, 10b-11a NLT). Noting that these brasher
traits are useful, maybe even essential, to the prophet is not to
broadly excuse poor behavior. The Apostle Paul points out that even
if he has prophetic revelations and understands all mysteries, but
lacks love, he has accomplished nothing (1 Corinthians 13). That is
to say there is a thin line between unyielding conviction and blind
arrogance, refreshing frankness and an uncalled for verbal assault.
It is true that untempered strengths often become destructive
weaknesses.
Not all
change is good change, and not every “reformer” is to be
followed. This should be obvious, but I'll say it just in case. For
every prophet who is faithfully advocating for the heart of God,
there's probably a hundred who are misrepresenting him. God spends
as much or more time denouncing the false prophets throughout
Scripture as he does endorsing the ones he has commissioned to carry
his message. It is imperative that the people of God know his voice,
his word, in order to accurately identify the prophets he is speaking
through. And we don't want to “know” his word like a Pharisee or
a pro-slavery clergyman with an arsenal of proof-texts at the ready,
the sort who can describe in great detail the bark on every tree but
has never once seen the lush forest that they collectively and beautifully
compose. We don't want to be like the guys who could quote the
Pentateuch verbatim but failed to recognize the Creator of the
universe when he stood spitting distance from their pedantic faces.
We want to truly KNOW the Word of God which/who effectively describes
the heart of a glorious Being who desires mercy over sacrifice—a
pulsating Gospel over dead religion.
I don't
want to paint a one-dimensional picture of the prophet. Their
message is not always negative, critical, sackcloth, and ashes. They
can cast a captivating vision of the way things could be, the way God
wants things to be. The prophets gave us glimpses of the Savior, for
example, centuries before he walked among us. Seeing that this post
is an attempt to understand our hostility toward the prophet,
however, I am naturally focusing on the stuff they say and do that
gets our dander up.
I thank
God for the modern prophets who are challenging me to rethink
treasured aspects of the American Dream in light of my Savior's
better invitation to take up my cross and follow him. I need my
idols of safety and security exposed so I can repent and whole-heartily pursue his kingdom. I know a guy who has been
faithfully challenging his friends and family on social media to
pursue God's heart for the marginalized, immigrant, and refugee by
welcoming war-torn Syrians in the name of Jesus. “Well, I'm fine
with the nice ones coming,” I hear the objectors say, “but we
can't risk terrorists coming in as well.” “It's just not safe,
is all.” “Plus, I've seen on the news how many of them
don't really appreciate the help they're being offered anyway.” My Jesus says,
“love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without
expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and
you will be children of the Most High, because he is kind to the
ungrateful and wicked” (Luke 6:35). It's clear that the American
Church needs to be reminded of God's heart for immigrants and mercy when we
consider how Evangelical voters have been flocking to anti-immigrant
presidential candidates as of late. We need prophets who point us
back to what we should already know. I for one appreciate those who
faithfully remind me of the beautiful and scary commands of Christ.
Prophets
are a gift from God. We actually need the prophets in our midst. In
his letter to the Ephesians, Paul explains how “Christ himself gave
the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the pastors and
teachers, to equip his people for works of service, so that the body
of Christ may be built up until we all reach unity in the faith and
in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to
the whole measure of the fullness of Christ” (chapter 4:11-13).
Jesus is the perfect apostle, prophet, evangelist, pastor, and
teacher. All these traits, or archetypes, must be collectively
present in his Body if we are to accurately portray him. We're
usually comfortable with the apostles (“sent ones” or
missionaries), evangelists, pastors, and teachers. But when the
music stops, it's often the prophet who is left without a chair. The
prophet is good in theory but often unpleasant and inconvenient in
reality. Unless we're masochists, we aren't so fond of having them
around. They push us out of our comfort zone and consistently expose
our idols. They're often perfectionists because they have their eyes
fixed on the Perfect, and they won't let us settle for anything less.
If all the Church were prophets, we could probably call it “hell”
and not be too far off. But just like the other members of the Body,
the prophet performs a unique and irreplaceable function. Let's not
assume that they're “just not good team players” and as a result
are constantly slowing the pace of the ministry machine. Like Ahab,
we're not always concerned with whether or not we're headed in the
right direction so long as we're getting there fast. Also, let's not forget that how well we can
receive a rebuke is ultimately a measure of our maturity. So how 'bout it folks? Can we agree to stop killing
the prophets?