If you grew up in church culture
like I did, chances are you had a moment in which you were instilled
with awe for “God's house.” Maybe it was when you were maniacally
running through the “sanctuary” (not really sure why we call it
that, by the way) or “worship center.” Perhaps you were gently
instructed to show proper respect for “the house of the Lord.” My
family and I would “go to church” every Sunday morning and at
various other times throughout the week for midweek Bible studies,
youth group, potlucks, game nights, Awana, VBS, rummage sales and so
on. God loved having people over. If you knew someone who needed to
meet Jesus, you would bring them to church too. Of course I
understood through Biblical teaching that God was everywhere and
lived in my heart, but it was also strongly implied through our
behavior that the building was where we were the church and
where all important church stuff took place. Don't misunderstand me;
I'm not a bitter ex-church kid. I loved hanging out at “God's
house.” I think there are a lot of good things going on—genuinely
redemptive activities—in the typical, building-centric, church
model. As I look through Scripture, though, I can't help but wonder
if there could be another model that more closely embodies Jesus'
intent for His Church.
“You are not the one to build me
a house to dwell in,” was God's response to King David's
well-intentioned offer to build Him a sweet pad (1 Chronicles 17:4b).
Ever since the tragedy of Eden, God has given us glimpses of His
endgame to once again dwell among humanity. He symbolically
represented His presence among His people, for example, with various
structures and artifacts. The first God-house was designed by Him to
be extremely mobile. He is a God on the go, after all. By the time of
David's reign, the people of Israel had been in the promised land for
generations. It seemed like the perfect time to go all out with an
upgrade to God's house. After God politely declined David's offer, He
made the shepherd king a significant counter-offer. “I will raise
up your offspring to succeed you, one of your own sons, and I will
establish his kingdom. He is the one who will build a house for
me, and I will establish his throne forever. I will be his
father, and he will be my son” (1 Chronicles 17:11b-13a). On the
one hand God is apparently giving the green light for David's son
Solomon to build the proposed structure, but there is also a sense in
which God is looking through Solomon to another “Son of David”
and to another “house” to be built. Solomon himself seemed to
recognize the limitations of the beautiful building he constructed.
“The heavens, even the highest heavens, cannot contain you,” he
says to God, “How much less this temple I have built!” (2
Chronicles 6:18b).
Centuries after Solomon's death,
David's other Son arrived on the scene ready to get to work. In the
second chapter of John's gospel, Jesus referred to His own body as
the true temple of God. “For in Christ all the fullness of the
Deity lives in bodily form” (Colossians 2:9). And when His
disciples commented on how beautiful the man-made building appeared,
He was quick to remind them that its days were now numbered. It had
become obsolete, as the “shadow” is supplanted by the “substance”
(Colossians 2:17). Jesus elaborated in a conversation with a
Samaritan woman in John chapter 4. He had just described the new
Spirit-filled life, which is made possible by His good news. She asks
Him to clarify where she should go to worship God. She
presupposes that His answer will be one of two possible locations.
He, of course, chooses neither. Instead He says, “A time is coming
when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in
Jerusalem. Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true
worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for
they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks” (John 4:21, 23).
The author of Hebrews explains,
“Jesus has been found worthy of greater honor than Moses, just as
the builder of a house has greater honor than the house
itself...Christ is faithful as the Son over God’s house. And,”
get this, “we are his house” (Hebrews 3:3, 6a). Peter says it
like this, “As you come to him, the living Stone—rejected by
humans but chosen by God and precious to him—you also, like living
stones, are being built into a spiritual house to be a holy
priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through
Jesus Christ” (1 Peter 2:4-5). And Paul adds, “You are no longer
foreigners and strangers, but fellow citizens with God’s people and
also members of his household, built on the foundation of the
apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief
cornerstone. In him the whole building is joined together and rises
to become a holy temple in the Lord. And in him you too are being
built together to become a dwelling in which God lives by his Spirit”
(Ephesians 2:19-22). We get a prophetic look at Jesus' completed
structure, made from “living stones,” in His revelation to John.
“Come, I will show you the bride, the wife of the Lamb,” says
John's angelic escort, “And he carried me away in the Spirit to a
mountain great and high, and showed me the Holy City, Jerusalem,
coming down out of heaven from God” (Revelation 21:9b-10). “And I
heard a loud voice from the throne saying, ‘Look! God’s dwelling
place is now among the people, and he will dwell with them. They will
be his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God’”
(Revelation 21:3).
So what does all this talk about
the structure Jesus is assembling have to do with our church
buildings and the emphasis we typically place on them? Well, the key
ideas that I take away from these passages are as follows: First off,
God wants to dwell among His people, the Church! How awesome is
that?! Secondly, and this is obvious but hugely important, Jesus
builds the Church. Thirdly, the Church is not a brick and mortar
building. It is comprised of “living stones,” who are pulled from
the rubble and made suitable by the finished work of the Cornerstone.
Jesus is the true temple, and it is only by the grace of God that we
participate in the structure as an extension of His body. And
finally, Jesus' Church is not confined to a building or tied to a
geographic location. He means for us to fill the earth with His glory
as we collectively declare and demonstrate His Gospel in everyday
life. Yet the building-centric model of church often corrals and
occupies the Church with its perpetual onsite programs and extensive
overhead (measured in both time and resources). I've heard it rightly
said that our buildings say “come” while our Jesus tells us to
“go.”
I'm not saying the Church
shouldn't gather. It's imperative that we do. I'm not even saying
that churches shouldn't build worship centers. There is no biblical
mandate or prohibition either way. It is documented that the First
Century Church met in homes and public spaces, but, in fairness to
the current model, there was nothing else available to them. And
while he was in Ephesus, Paul seemed to have rented or borrowed a
lecture hall for ministry purposes (Acts 19:9). Ultimately, if we
become dogmatic about gathering exclusively in living rooms and
coffee shops over traditional church buildings we have completely
missed the point. Where we worship isn't the issue (to
paraphrase Jesus' comments to the woman at the well). Furthermore, I
would never want to jeopardize the positive elements currently found
in the prevalent model with a mass exodus to nothing. There is a
growing counter movement to the building-centric model, for example,
that casts off all submission and structure in favor of an undefined
and individualistic Christian anarchy of sorts. This is not the
“progress” that I am suggesting. Whatever model we embrace, the
Church is to be a family, a community, with accompanying obligations
of accountability, submission, and service. Given some of the
alternate models, I can understand why many Christians passionately
defend a continued reliance on our church buildings and their
accompanying programs. It's all many of us have known. Numerous
people who pass through our doors meet Jesus, are often discipled,
and can become genuine followers of Christ. And I certainly don't
mean to disparage the numerous hours, resources, blood, sweat, and
tears that untold American Christ-followers have poured into the
current centralized model. It pains me to think that the questions
I’m raising are often seen as most threatening and hurtful to those
who are very invested in the current model—faithful brothers and
sisters who love and serve Jesus’ Church with all that they are.
But if we aim to be faithful representatives of our incarnational
King, then we must be brave enough to question some of our arbitrary
traditions. More than this, we must be willing to die to our
preferences and preconceptions if need be.
The
American Church is increasingly living in a post-Christian culture.
Statistics show the number of our friends, co-workers, and neighbors
who will never set foot in our buildings—regardless of how
“current” or “relevant” we make them—is growing
exponentially. We need to figure out how to take everything that's
going right in the current model (declaration and demonstration of
the Gospel: confession/repentance, baptisms, celebrating the last
supper together, worship, teaching, discipleship/modeling) and move
it into our neighborhoods, common areas, and places of business. It
seems that most American Christians believe that faithfully attending
and contributing to the weekly gathering(s) encompasses all or most
of what it is to be an active member of a church. Our frustrated and
exhausted pastors and elders may be preaching “go,” “love,”
and “serve,” but the prevalent building-centric model is silently
contradicting them with “come,” “sit,” and “spectate.” Or
at best, “come and participate in all that goes into our Sunday
gathering and midweek programs so that others can come, sit, and
spectate.” The less than 10% of church members that typically
answer the second invitation and dedicate more than 90% of the time
and resources required to maintain the building and programs are
often left with so little time or energy that they are unlikely to
invite their Muslim neighbors over for dinner or to join a bowling
league or book club with Gospel intentions. We have in many ways
unintentionally crafted a system that leaves no time or energy for
what we most want—what God most wants—to see: That is redemption
and restoration, up close and in everyday life, in our neighborhoods
and workplaces through the Gospel of Jesus Christ. If only we could
place less emphasis on our gatherings and put more energy into our
goings. We are not called to congregate in “sacred spaces.” We
are called to be a sacred people who, like Jesus, bring the good news
of the kingdom of God into the midst of a hurting and broken world.
This is the nature and function of the house that Jesus built and is
building. This is the sort of house that God will dwell in.
No comments:
Post a Comment